Business Stock photos by Vecteezy
Effective stewardship is more essential than ever in sustainable finance. The recently released white paper from WHEB, ‘From Obstacles to Outcomes: Enhancing Effectiveness in Stewardship and Engagement’, highlights the critical areas where stewardship and engagement can evolve to foster meaningful, long-term value for clients and society. For investment professionals, asset managers, and sustainable finance advocates, WHEB’s insights offer a roadmap to refining engagement practices amidst growing client demand, regulatory shifts, and a push for sustainability in capital markets.
The landscape of stewardship is brimming with obstacles – complexities have surged as engagement activities and regulatory demands have increased. According to WHEB, three primary challenges emerge:
While there’s broad agreement that stewardship should promote long-term economic, social, and environmental value, there’s far less clarity on its fundamental elements. WHEB argues that asset managers must align their engagement objectives with the mandates driving each investment strategy. Clear, standardised definitions of engagement activities and success metrics would help practitioners consistently measure impact and avoid “engagement-washing’ – a term used to describe the practice of overstating or exaggerating engagement efforts without delivering real outcomes. Engagement-washing undermines the credibility of stewardship activities and risks misleading stakeholders about an asset manager’s genuine impact.
Effective stewardship can be resource-intensive, and WHEB emphasises the importance of targeting engagements based on materiality. For small investors like WHEB, this involves focusing on issues that hold long-term significance to the investee company’s success. Larger institutional investors, on the other hand, might benefit from addressing market-level issues that raise standards across industries, leaving asset-specific engagements to active managers with concentrated portfolios.
Reporting remains one of the biggest gaps in stewardship. Traditional reporting tends to emphasise quantity over quality – leading to metrics based on the number of engagements rather than the outcomes achieved. WHEB advocates for a focus on correlation rather than causality, suggesting that reporting should demonstrate alignment between engagement activities and tangible outcomes that matter to clients.
WHEB’s white paper outlines a practical framework for tackling these challenges by setting clear engagement objectives and demonstrating accountability. Here are a few key strategies they suggest:
WHEB stresses the need for well-defined, objective-led engagement. Rather than routine interactions with companies, effective engagement should focus on specific goals, such as reducing GHG emissions or improving governance practices. For WHEB, measurable outcomes can range from improved disclosures on emissions to strategic changes that align with long-term business and sustainability goals.
High-quality engagement often requires time, focus, and deep understanding of each investee company. WHEB recommends that asset managers adopt an integrated approach where engagement is led by core investment analysts familiar with each company’s unique challenges. In-depth, relationship-driven engagement yields better outcomes, reinforcing the alignment of stewardship efforts with broader business objectives.
WHEB’s strategy blends “bottom-up” analysis of individual companies with “programmatic” engagements on broad issues affecting multiple holdings, such as climate change. They also engage reactively on emerging issues, particularly where reputational risks might arise. For example, they worked with HelloFresh to address concerns raised by animal rights groups, ensuring that the issue didn’t impact the company’s brand or operational stability.
One of the white paper’s most thought-provoking insights is WHEB’s nuanced approach to reporting engagement outcomes. Rather than seeking strict causality, WHEB’s methodology focuses on correlating engagement activities with positive results, enabling asset managers to demonstrate contributions to desired outcomes without exhaustive proof of direct causation. KPIs play a role here, linking engagement outcomes to both investment and client objectives, and providing meaningful milestones for tracking progress.
Additionally, WHEB uses detailed case studies to illustrate how engagement contributes to long-term portfolio success. This approach enriches quantitative data with narrative context, ensuring that clients and stakeholders see the tangible impact of engagement practices.
WHEB’s white paper emphasises the importance of collaboration in the stewardship ecosystem. In addressing systemic issues like climate change or biodiversity loss, collective action with peer institutions, NGOs, and policymakers is essential. WHEB believes that this holistic, ecosystem-based approach amplifies the impact of engagement by addressing risks that could affect entire markets.
WHEB’s white paper highlights a pivotal moment for asset managers: as stewardship grows in importance, so does the need for clarity, efficiency, and strategic focus. For professionals in sustainable finance, WHEB’s insights present a compelling case for outcome-oriented stewardship that balances client goals with the broader pursuit of a sustainable economy.
By shifting focus from the quantity of engagement to its quality and aligning activities with clear, material outcomes, practitioners can better demonstrate the long-term value of stewardship. This transparency and effectiveness will drive higher standards across the industry and reinforce the role of investor engagement as a critical lever for positive change.
SI Engage helps organisations to elevate the quality and effectiveness of their stewardship and engagement efforts. Our platform is here to support your strategy for impactful, outcome-driven engagement.
Get in touch with us to explore how we can help your organisation achieve its stewardship goals!
